Inclusiveness
is the exclusive characteristic of Hinduism and to try to destroy it
amounts to rob Hinduism of its essence. Hinduism has the capacity to
absorb all varied ideologies and philosophies and give out of that
fusion a well-developed system of ideology.
To
understand the inclusiveness of Hinduism there are other points to be
noted. The word religion has come from Latin word "religare",
meaning to bind together (society). As per Indian term Dharma, it
means, to hold by a duty. Proprietary religions have a prophet and a
particular form of God to be worshiped. They have scripture of some
form such as Kuran (Islam), Bible (Christianity), Torah (Judaism) or
Manusmruti (Brahmanism) and more. The writings in these scriptures
are taken as truth and anything else is considered as false. All
proprietary religions have a specific standardized mode in their
structure. They have a specific type of priesthood system to manage
the flock that show faith in that religion. To spread these religions
often use of terror is made by its propagators. Fanaticism is often
found in these proprietary religions. In many cases, a mass killing
of those who refused to accept that religion is recorded in History.
To note a few such mass killings we know Adi Sankar of Brahmanism was
instrumental for killing of many thousand Hindus, Jains and
Buddhists; Jesuit cleric Xavier had killed millions of Hindus and
Chinese because they refused to convert to Christianity. Interesting
part is that these religions talk of Love, mercy and compassion in
their teachings at the same time. A particular code of conduct is
compulsory in these religions and if not then those who do not
practice that code are punished by their priests by passing dictate
against them condemning them as, infidels. Hate campaigns are often
practiced by the preachers of these religions to malign other
religions. Comparing between gods of other religions and trying to
show how their particular god is better than those of others is
standard practice in most of these religions. The priest of these
religions talk in a fashion that they are selling their gods! One may
compare these religions with a business campaign of a product. As one
company tries to prove that, its product is better than that of other
competitors, similarly, campaigns are undertaken amongst these
proprietary religions. Professionalism is obvious in all the
activities of priesthood of these religions trying to promote
respective religion. Giving false promises to attract people from
other faiths is common practice in these religions. Infusing fear
complex in the needy people to make them accept that religion is also
common amongst most religions. Conversion to their religions is often
practiced by the priests of these religions. Catholic Christian nuns
from Kerala are known for this practice while propagating for
Catholic Christianity. These are some common characteristics of
proprietary religions. As against these, we see Hinduism does not
have any of them. That shows that Hinduism is not a religion of
proprietary type but very different. However, here we should note
that most Brahmanic preachers claim to be professing Hinduism; there
by creating confusion in the mids of observers. Shankaracharys people
claim to be chiefs of Brahmanic Hinduism but they are not recognized
by other Hindus.
There is
no standardized mode of structure in Hindus like we see in
proprietary religions. Hinduism has no prophet and so it is not a
proprietary religion. No particular form of God is worshiped by
Hindus. There is a plethora of Gods and Goddesses worshiped by
Hindus. Since they do not have any standardized code of practice we
see a variety of styles of worship being practiced by communities
amongst Hindus and all are treated as equally good. There is no one
scripture that guides Hindus but it is the traditional knowledge of
people that guides them. We see some Hindus accept some scripture as
standard for them while some others have other scripture as their
guide. In spite of all these and many more differences, they are all
equally Hindu. As of Gods, there are Hindus who do not accept that
there is god and even so, they are equal Hindus as those who accept
any form of God. Hinduism was never spread by terror or by giving
false promises or by any other method to increase the number of its
believers. Hindus never used hate campaigns to malign other religions
but on the contrary tried to absorb them and in this process, many
ancient religions have been absorbed into Hindu fold and merged
perfectly giving a uniform congenial society. However, in spite of
these many differences, we see some common points in Hinduism that
holds it together. Hinduism accepts that there is rebirth and one is
born after some time of death and life continues. Most Hindus
practice cremation of dead person. All-important functions of life
such as birth, name giving, marriage and death have a variety of
styles practiced by variety of Hindu communities and they are all
considered as equally correct. There are some common festivals such
as, Diwali and Holi, enjoyed by most Hindus. Hinduism has many
offshoots due to its nature to absorb varied ideologies and these
branches comprise of a family of religions such as Brahmanism,
Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism to that are added many sects such as
Shaivism, Vaishnava, Shakta, tantra and many more. All Hindus are
divided on these branches but at the same time keep one common link
that is of concept of rebirth and balance of virtues and sins, called
in Indian terms, "Karmavipak". This principle of Karmavipak
means one has to get his deeds (karma) back to him/her in ensuing
births equal and opposite. That means good deeds give good luck in
next birth and bad deeds give bad luck. Conclusively it means we are
solely responsible of our good and bad lucks. Due to this ideology
Hindus do not blame god for their bad luck but try to appeal to Holy
spirits to help him/her in surviving through those bad luck effects;
promising to them that he/she shall not do any bad deed henceforth.
This is
to show how Hinduism is much different from proprietary religions.
Since ancient times Hinduism has been functioning as a master solvent
of many faiths. This capacity of Hinduism is rear and not found in
any other religion. Number of contradictory philosophical renderings
to understand the universe, are accepted in a very democratic manner
without any offensive reactions. A Hindu could be believer in one
god; a Hindu believing in many gods and a Hindu not accepting
presence of god are all Hindus. Hindus believing in different gods
are still Hindus of equal rights. We cannot see this complex system
functioning in a very congenial manner anywhere else. Many gods in
Hinduism are generally attributed to the nature of this universal
religion to absorb varied sects and ideologies of varied communities.
Even so,
we see some discrepancy in Hindu practices and unless that is
thoroughly presented and sorted out, this discussion cannot be
completed justly. This inconsistency is due to some types of Hindus
who claim that they are standard Hindus! This we see in Brahman
Hindus who claim to be true representatives of Hinduism! In other
words, their practice is called a separate religion specific to
Brahman people who claim to be authentic priests of Hinduism even
though Hinduism does not have any such authentic priesthood. That
religion is an offshoot from Hindu practices of ancient origin and it
is called Sanatan Dharma or Brahmanism. The behavioral pattern of
Brahmanism is much like that of other proprietary religions such as
Islam, Christianity, Jainism, Buddhism, Judaism and such many. To
understand about this phenomenon of offshoots in Hinduism we will
consider its reason. As I have mentioned earlier in this article that
Hinduism is a master solvent of religions and that it has absorbed
many minor faiths in its stride; Brahmanism or Sanatan Dharma is one
such that was absorbed in ancient times. Whereas other branches of
Hinduism distinctly like to be mentioned as that such as, a Jain
calls him Jain, a Buddhist prefers to call him a Buddhist, and a Sikh
prefers to be mentioned as a Sikh; a Brahman practicing Brahmanism
insists to be mentioned as a Hindu. This creates much confusion in
the minds of observers. Even though, technically it is not wrong this
practice confuse all Hindus who are neither Brahman, nor Jain, nor
Buddhist nor Sikh but only Hindu. Various living practices of only
Hindus are much different from those of Brahman. To show a few
differences I shall give examples, Brahman is vegan while most Hindus
are none vegan, Brahman prefer and insist to worship gods such as
Ram, Krishna, Shiva while Hindus mostly worship female deities and in
addition to that the above given gods also. Hindus do not have any
objection in showing respect for other gods of other religions such
as Allah, Mary, Christ etc., Hindus give sacrificial animal to their
chosen deity while Brahman being vegan prefer only vegan offerings
(mostly coconut, they break coconut instead of killing an animal
before their god) to their god. In most Hindus worship and other
matters related with prayers are lead by their own clerics and
Brahman priests are not called for that. Only about three percent
Hindus call Brahman priests to perform their rituals, rest do it by
themselves. Brahman is not recognized by most Hindus as their
priests. Many practices of Hindus are much different from those of
Brahman and on that account; there are many differences between
Brahman and other Hindus. Brahmans being from a proprietary religion
have militant organizations such as RSS, Bajarng dal, Vishwa Hindu
parishad (VHP) and many more to convert Hindus to their ideology.
They try to spread their veganism by introducing various conditions
using laws such as prevention of cruelty to animals and such other so
that sacrifices to their gods they (other Hindus) will not be able to
do; Jains join them in that endeavor. While they try to stop Hindus
from such sacrifices they do not mind Muslims from performing similar
sacrifices according to their religion. On those occasions this law
of prevention to cruelty of animal is conveniently forgotten by both
Brahmans and Jains!
All this
further complicates the matter when Brahman calls him a Hindu instead
of a Brahman. Brahmanism being a proprietary religion all its
behavioral habits are very different from those of real Hindus
creating confusion. Other offshoot religions (Jainism, Buddhism,
Sikhism) are also proprietary but they are mentioned as separate when
it come to mention them this type of confusion is not created in
their cases. To add to this confusion some Brahman began to convert
Hindus to Brahmanism by establishing hawkish organizations such as
RSS. Even though Hindu Mahasabha is a Brahman organization, they call
it Hindu Mahasabha! They should with full honesty call it Brahman
Mahasabha. This is an example to show how Brahmans create
deliberately confusion to observers. This conversion of Hindus to
Brahmanism is similar to conversion of Hindus to other proprietary
religions. These converted Hindus still call them Hindu even though
now they are Brahman! For example, our present PM of the government
of India is Mr. Narendra Modi, who is converted to Brahmanism still
calls himself as Hindu! Adding to more confusion. Many wrong doings
of Brahman are attributed to Hinduism creating much misunderstanding.
Fanaticism is often found in Brahmanic religion. Which is absolutely
absent in Hinduism. Hateful speeches and encouraging violence are
often found practiced by these Brahmans and their militant
organizations such as RSS; but often put the blame on Hindus. Brahman
hate true Hindus just like other proprietary religions and that often
times creates confusion as less trained observers cannot understand
that behavior of some people who still call themselves Hindu! Clever
observers can note these differences so they are not fooled by
Brahmanic propaganda. This discrepancy if properly understood many
misunderstandings about Hinduism can be resolved without much hassle.
To
conclude I may suggest that all observers should understand this
inclusive nature of Hinduism and separate it from Brahmanism which
lacks this inclusiveness much like other proprietary religions. Our
law should make it mandatory for Brahmans to mention them as Brahmans
and not Hindus just they way other sects of Hinduism like Jains,
Buddhists, Sikhs are mention separately, to avoid this confusion.
You may contact me on my Email ID given below,
My
email ID
ashokkothare@gmail.com
You are invited to visit
my other blogs
Ashok
Kothare
for stories, http://ashokkotharesblog.blogspot.com/
I
reckon
for philosophy, http://kothareviews.blogspot.com/
You
may visit blog, Freedom of Expression,
http://blogs.siliconindia.com/kothare
for intelligent discussions.
Freedom
of Expression, http://Kothare-thinks.blogspot.in/
No comments:
Post a Comment