Here I am
putting my observations about what is possible if a separate Vidarbha
State is formed. Nitin Gadkari of BJP tells that he wants to develop
Vidarbha by bringing in Macro industries. Here I want to ask him what
he means by development and whose development?
There are
three types of developments. Development of local people, development
in revenue and development of politicians-bureaucrats. What Nitin is
doing will stimulate the last two development; but for local people
to develop Macro industries in not the answer at least as far as
Vidarbha people are concerned.
Let me
explain what I mean by that. Bringing Macro Industries in a place
helps local people only if local people are industrious.
Unfortunately local people of Vidarbha are not exactly industrious.
They are lazy and more on the side of relaxing and leisure. This
nature of people of Vidarbha is well known in Maharashtra. Many jokes
are cut on this laziness of these people. Vidarbha people also do not
mind this fact. If we do survey of existing Macro industries in that
region we will see that most jobs are done by outsiders from other
states such as Rajasthan, MP, Bengal, Oriya, UP, (Maharashtra) and
Bihar. Very few jobs are done by local people. That means if, as what
Nitin Gadkari says, really happens there will be exodus of aspiring
industrious people from else where and they will get jobs while local
people will remain without jobs. This may give in due course rise of
Vidarbha Sena on the same line as Shiv Sena. May be, Shiv Sena will
open that branch in Vidarbha and a political crisis develops. As it
is, Shiv Sena is having bitterness against BJP, we know of it!
This
development will earn the government revenue that will be good for
that state. At bureaucrats' level a lot of corruption will develop
and all politicians and bureaucrats will make a lot of black money.
These are plus points (!) of policy of bringing Macro industrial
activity in Vidarbha.
This asks
a question about how then this state can benefit local people. As per
my study only improvement in agricultural side will bring succor to
local people this I say because major population of Vidarbha is of
farmers. Development of agriculture may not earn much revenue and
also may not benefit politicians and bureaucrats by corruption but
that will benefit local farmers. That means development of this state
will require Macro industries for the benefit of politicians and
bureaucrats as well as revenue. The state may be able to earn its
living by that and that way Nitin Gadkari is correct but what about
local people for whom Modi is committed. We also see that only
farming will not benefit farmers as we have seen in many cases the
cost of produce is hardly or marginally satisfied by its price. Main
agricultural produce is cotton. There is always struggle for its
pricing. Therefore, to resolve that 'value addition', policy
government should adopt. In case of cotton the only principal use is
to make yarn. Almost all cotton goes to spinning mills. If government
allows farmers to have Amber Charakas farmers will convert his cotton
into yarn at his place and sell directly yarn. This will give value
added price to him. I have worked on Amber charakas and I know for
sure a farmer can convert his small quantity of cotton out put into
yarn and that is possible economically. Many farmers produce very
little cotton and selling it does not give any income. However, if he
is allowed to convert it into yarn and sell it he will make more
money. The cost of running Amber charka is not much. Moreover, the
expertise is available with Khadi gramodyog institutes. They can
train members of the farmer's family to operate it and help augment
his income. Small carding loom is available, generally used by bed
and cushion makers, is used for carding of cotton to remove seeds and
also to remove spoiled cotton. Separating spoiled cotton is another
additional activity which will give cotton seeds and farmer can sell
it; separately adding more income to his purse. Spoiled cotton is
used to make cellulose fiber or rayon. That will give additional
income when farmer sells that to rayon mills. Running a spinning mill
is not economical otherwise, but an Amber charka run by farmer in his
house can give yarn at much cheaper price. The cost of overheads
makes these spinning mills uneconomical. That problem will not exist
if farmers do it at home.
The
policy of value addition should be adopted in Vidarbha to improve
income of farmers. There are other farm produce such as soybean and
gram. In gram there is chance for conversion of simple gram into many
varieties of farsan. Producing soy milk and soy paneer (tofu) is
possible in small scale units. Farmers should be trained to produce
these value additions. In this way by value addition farmer of
Vidarbha will be able to manage his expenses. Other agencies may come
up to do marketing of these products. Vidarbha can grow milk industry
(dairy) and if possible develop meat industry as 70% Indians are meat
eaters; even though, present BJP people may not be eating it. I mean
be meat industry the activity of breeding and then slaughtering
animals to produce meat. If we consider only selling bred animal to
slaughter houses earning is very little. Here again value addition
becomes important. If meat industry comes up we can add leather
tanning and other leather related products. All these activities come
under Micro activities. They will give proper employments to local
people particularly SC and ST class can benefit by them. For
development of meat industry they should allow deer farms because the
"meat to feed", ratio of deer is better than that of sheep
or lamb. Government should be open for all tangible industrial
activities without making prestige issues of small things.
When
Linguistic states were considered a proposal for Vidarbha state was
also considered. But after scrutiny the committee came to know that
the state cannot be formed because it does not have enough resources
for revenue so that the state can manage its expenses. Therefore,
Vidarbha was not given status of a separate State. The same situation
continues even today. However, if all the things discussed above
considered, a separate Vidarbha may be successful. If Nitin Gadkari
depends solely on Macro activity to build economy of that state I am
doubtful of its merits. This Macro activity will create more
socio-economic problems and solve little.
I hope my
suggestions reach Nitin Gadkari and Devendra Fadanavis. After proper
development is achieved in Micro activity they should take up the
task for separate Vidarbha.
You may contact me on
my Email ID given below,
You are invited to visit
my other blogs
You
may visit blog, Ideas
and tips on any subject,
http://kotharay.blogspot.in/
for intelligent discussions.
No comments:
Post a Comment