When
I studied history of medieval India, observed that the invading
Muslims conquered the country as if, “came, saw and conquered”,
as the great Alexander said. Prior to that in early history we see
that outside invaders were not able to even enter into the mainland
India, Emperor Alexander’s invasion we can show for that matter as
an example. So, what was the reason? Many Muslim historians give
credit to the blessings of Allah to the invading army of the Muslim
but as I do not believe in such illogical explanations, I wanted to
find out what had gone wrong so that they could win all wars with
Hindu rulers so easily.
At
that time, Afghanistan and a measure portion of present day Pakistan
was observing Buddhi religion. In mainland India, Jainism and
Hinduism with Brahmanic control were the important religions.
Buddhism and Jainism professed non-violence and under that, influence
people of those areas had become very non-violent and continued a
life of peace and stability. They prospered due to trade that passed
through those areas. Chinese merchandise passed through Afghanistan
(this is silk route) to the west and that trade was their main
activity, while Indian merchandise was passing through Sindh and
other parts of Pakistan. How Buddhism destroys capacity to defend, we
see today in Tibet. If you are a Buddhi or Jain, these religions
deprive you of your capacity to defend yourself and as a result, any
body can conquer you. This is the measure defect of these two
religions.
When
Mallick Amber invaded Afghanistan, he received practically no
resistance from the local people, as they were not prepared for such
an eventuality. Mallick Amber conquered that region with his crowd of
hooligans (they were called gazwa) and established his religion
perforce on the defeated people of that place. He converted those
people to his religion and infused in them the policy of violence
that is the main principle of Islam. They in turn spread the religion
to other parts in the same violent way. That means the victory of
Arab soldier was due to the Buddhi religion and its non-violence
principle and not because the Arabs were any big fighters. Similarly,
in India Jainism made passage easy for the Muslim marauders. During
that time many kings from the north India supported Jainism. Many
even did not have any army worth the name!
Amongst
the Hindu rulers, the problem had different connotation. Here the
Brahmanic control was the problem. Brahmans were all out to
demoralize the warrior clans generally called Kshatrya. The method
they used was very callous. In that, whenever in any battle between
two Kshatrya clans any one as gets defeated, the Brahmans would
declare that defeated clan Sudra (servant class). Brahmans were the
holders of priesthood and so their commands or decree was binding on
all and so the defeated clan would submit to that declaration and
accept the insult of becoming servant class or sudra which is the
fourth class in Hindus as per Brahmanic order (Bhagwatgita order is
different).
Kshatrya
class had distinction for holding some privileges. They had right to
posses weapons and hold them, right to learn all fighting skills,
right to learn scriptures and other disciplines, riding horse and to
possess one, to own and also drive the chariot, to wear a specific
head gear that indicate that the person is a Kshatrya. They were
supposed to boast a beard and mustaches. They dressed in crimson or
yellow colored silk attire. They could possess servants and slaves.
They had right to learn many subjects and be proficient in them. They
can have property of land and farms. They were called Dvija (द्विज)
on par with Brahmans. Most importantly, they were having a right of
vote in the court of the King. Guru Nanak reintroduced this Kshatriya
order in his religion, that was called Sikhism in Punjab. That helped
stop further progress of Islam in India. Guru Nanak did not invent
any new religion, he only reestablished Kshatrya order; very few are
aware of this. A careful study of how Guru Nanak kept Brahman from
his order of Kshatriya reveals why he introduced praying of a Book in
place of an idol; a novel idea indeed. Had he reintroduced any idol
worship surely Brahman priests would get into it and their hold on
Sikhs would be established. In Maharashtra this dress code was in
practice and that becomes evident from the dress of Lord Shivaji. In
history we observe that Brahmans were trying to demoralize Kshatriya
by various means and when some Brahman began to hold power as kings
this desire to destroy Kshatriya initiative became more intense. This
one sided rivalry was primarily responsible for marginalizing of
Kshatriya cult. Make way open for foreign powers to enter into
Hindustan.
On
declaring them Sudra, all above given privileges were lost to them
and instead they had to do following things. A Sudra must go to work
on the farm as servants in the houses of Brahman and also Vaishya
(Trader class). They had to do all menial jobs and could not demand
any rights. In other words, a Sudra was similar to a slave.
Over
the period, the Brahmans demoralized many Kshatrya having been
defeated from battles with rival clans by declaring them Sudra. As a
result, when Muslim marauders attacked, there were hardly any
well-trained warriors in the country to defend it. India and Hindu
nation was lost to the invaders. If you read the accounts of how
temple of Somnath, Mohammad Gazni looted, you will know what a
pathetic condition Hindus had.
My
further research showed to me that the Sudra of North India (from
Punjab to MP) are from Kshatrya clans of Jats, Yadaw, Greco-roman,
and Hun. In the western India the Sudra are from the Kshatriya of
Lohana, Jat, and Greco-roman. Today, we know Bhangi and Ddhed, in
Gujarat and Rajasthan are actually Lohana, Jat and Greco-roman
Kshatriya. Greco-roman are descendants of Alexander’s army, they
were gradually absorbed into the Hindu system as Kshatrya. Present
Hindu system was being formed during the time after Alexander’s
invasion.
In
Maharashtra, the Mahar was the indigenous Kshatriya clan and the
Brahmans of Satawahan rulers (Deshastha Brahman) fooled them to
become Sudra. I do not know of Sudra of South India but I feel there
also story cannot be any different. Today measure population of India
is made of the Sudra who are actually Kshatrya. Unfortunately, due to
neglect of many centuries they have forgotten their real value and
have accepted the present status. Nevertheless, many Kshatrya
embraced Islam during that rule and abandoned Hinduism. Most of the
Muslims of north India come from that type they are mostly Yadaw and
Singh. In Gujarat, we see Lohana and Jats taken to Islam to get away
from Brahman atrocities. Brahmans were responsible for the invasion
and conversion of many Hindus to the alien religions. British Raj
stopped that process by destroying importance of this callous
community. If I say it was British rule that saved Hindus from
atrocities of Brahmanic supremacy, it will not be any overstatement.
I have not done any facts finding of regions in eastern and
north-eastern part of India.
This
research shows that the country lost freedom to the outsiders because
of Brahmans and Jains and their callousness. Today things are
different. The British Raj demoralized Brahman forces in their own
coin. If we carefully observe we see that most of all so-called
freedom fighters were from this callous Brahman community. Generally,
British government better looked after common persons in India, so
they had no resistance to them. All Hindus and Indians should thank
God that British came to rule in India and for saving them from the
inhuman behavior of Brahmans. Today Brahmans have no such sweeping
powers any more however, they are lurking in the shadows in new forms
such as BJP, RSS, Vishwa Hindu Parishad and many more sundry
sobriquets. I will not be surprised if they get a chance, may again
bring their foolish order and begin to harass Hindus once more. Bad
part of the story is that most Hindus are as yet, not aware of this
danger from Brahmans.
You
may contact me on my Email ID given below,
You
are invited to visit my other blogs
Ashok
Kothare,
http://ashokkotharesblog.blogspot.com/
for
stories
I
reckon,
http://kotharesviews.blogspot.com/
for philosophy
You
may visit blog, Freedom
of Expression,
http://blogs.siliconindia.com/kothare/
for intelligent discussions.
Freedom
of Expression, http://kothare-thinks.blogspot.in/
No comments:
Post a Comment