Continued from the
earlier post -
This
is the most important side of this topic. I do not have any definite
evidence but from other sources, one can visualize that as the Roman
Empire fail the priesthood adopted the new trend very quickly and
began to profess for a new religion around Christ or Jesus. The
guilty consciousness that, they caused unnecessary torture on him had
developed in them a certain amount of sympathy for him. There were no
claimants for this new teaching and adopting it was the most
convenient way to grab a new religion. The prophet of this new
religion was not present on the scene that he may interfere, take
objections, or correct them. The Church of Rome did not know that
local authorities had allowed the followers of Jesus to release him
from the cross; as such, they were probably under the impression that
Jesus died on the cross and under this prejudice, they prepared their
typical argument which the Church is using till today. The argument
is that, "Jesus died on the cross for the sinners". That
means, local authorities under General Pilate did not bother to
inform Roman Church of that for reasons best known to him. Probably
it may be, to keep this matter under carpet, so that through Roman
Church anybody from Jewish priests would come to know the truth that,
Jesus is alive and intact. If today Catholic Church of Rome accepts
the fact that, Jesus did not die on cross but was resurrected from it
by his followers and treated well to recover from the wounds of
nails, it will be a big problem to them, as their typical argument
that the Church is using for so many years will prove to be false.
This argument is used by the Church for all these many years
successfully to keep the flock together under its cloak. Church has
also developed many stories about resurrection of Jesus from his
tomb. The festival of Good Friday and many such things, all these
will be exposed as being false stories imagined by fertile brains of
Roman priests. To top that, they will have to cancel their symbol of
Cross in many styles to represent Christianity. Cross became symbol
because it is believed that Jesus died on Cross. They will have to
invent some new symbol to represent Christianity if they now accept
that Jesus did not die on the Cross. We note that almost all
preaching is around the concept that Jesus died on Cross. Therefore,
we should appreciate the awkward position in which these Churches
(Roman, Eastern Orthodox and Syrian and other) are positioned against
the truth. For that reason, it is not possible for the Church to
accept this reality easily now. However, we do see that in some
places Church is no more using plane Cross as symbol of Christianity
but a sign of glowing star on a post is shown to represent Jesus.
That clearly shows that Church is cleverly shifting itself form the
cross in a very smart way. Soon Cross will be totally discarded and
the glowing Star will probably replace it everywhere. Nevertheless,
they cannot accept that Jesus did not die at that time but continued
to live much longer in some far away land; Hind. There are stories of
Jesus as he went out to Jerusalem and moved with his apostles, the
authorities went on spreading the rumor that Jesus after dying
returned from the heaven and so Jewish priests were kept from
doubting the honesty of Roman police who had told them that Jesus was
dead.
Continues in next
post -
You may contact
me on my Email ID given below,
You are invited to
visit my other blogs
Ashok
Kothare, http://ashokkotharesblog.blogspot.com/
for
stories
I
reckon,
http://kotharesviews.blogspot.com/
for philosophy
You
may visit blog, Freedom of Expression,
http://blogs.siliconindia.com/kothare/
for intelligent discussions.
Freedom
of Expression, http://kothare-thinks.blogspot.in/
Marathi
blog,
http://kothare-marathi.blogspot.in/
मला
असे वाटते
No comments:
Post a Comment